🔗 Share this article

I have some opinions about the remarks delivered by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer after Novak Djokovic's win over Taylor Fritz during the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, Fowler is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently encourage patriotic sentiment. Some letdown was understandable. Rather, he brought up the continued absence of US male players at the majors: not one of them had lifted a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the competition.

We all enjoy a narrative, me too. But really. Even if Fritz defeated Djokovic for the first time, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the next round, whom he has yet to beat in an official match. And if he’d somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the last seven major titles (and Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a fatigued Djokovic in the next round). He said in press following his defeat that he in fact preferred his path, because it offered the opportunity to beat the top three competitors in the sport in succession. Fritz is more than within his right to aim for the achievement; an competitor is supposed to believe in themselves. But going into that Serbian quarter-final who else sensibly had the drought of US winners on the brain?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier between her and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is ranked fourth in the global rankings entering this week’s year-end championships and has secured his previous six encounters over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. Presumably he might take that spot for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that at present, that is as high as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a chasm of performance metrics away. His elite delivery and concussive power on both front side and reverse side are sufficiently adequate to defeat the majority of rivals on the professional circuit. Against the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is often helpless. The past few years has witnessed the interesting emergence of lanky, towering athletes who can nevertheless cover the court with the alarming quickness and fluidity of smaller men. Fritz is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he seldom win a rally that the opponent was controlling, and playing a soft shot versus him is typically a safe bet. That serves as a quite harsh restriction on his upside.

Fritz has made a several significant, unexpected advancements throughout his career. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years after, he was sniffing the top 10. The previous season, he suddenly surged up to fourth place – and held the spot. But the next leap, mixing it up with and beating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and even a aging Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the ongoing slump of American men lifting major titles when Fritz had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just too much and the appreciation for the difficulty of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon last four in the summer.

The American's performance in that exact last eight match should have been enough of an indication. The Serbian triumphed in four rounds, a victory that only felt uncertain for brief periods towards the very end, when Fritz had survived a couple match points and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair appeared evenly matched during the rallies, with the American creating numerous chances to break. But the champion rescued break point after service break opportunity, prolonging the run to the brink of agony. When he eventually did convert one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a terrible game to lose his own serve again; the Serbian had lulled him into a skirmish peripheral to the real battle and forced him to expend excessive effort to prevail. Down set points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve sailed to heaven. He prolonged the match twice on his second serve, but finally double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, I didn’t think, just a consequence of having to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The contest was quite ironclad evidence that the American is not good enough to beat any version of Djokovic, that was defeated by Alcaraz in the next round and never particularly seem like he thought he could win. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the height of his athletic abilities anymore, but has acquired sufficient knowledge and tactical know-how to make up for a significant portion of the decline. The problem is those who were expecting Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was yet to accomplished anything that indicated he would.

The American is an valuable contributor to the tour regardless. He’s a calm, reflective voice in media sessions, exceeding virtually anyone on the men's tour except for the Russian star, willing to not only say how he feels or the tactic he felt determined a match, but clarify it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unjust. (Since Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, maybe they can divide that load.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it forever if I don’t accomplish it,” Fritz told an interviewer in June of claiming a major. I hope he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not achieve that objective, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is actually extremely improbable for all other players. {